TILL (off topic)
Daniel L. Diamond errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 27 May 1999 15:45:19 -0400 (EDT) (00927852319, Pine.SOL.3.95q.990527153925.7288A-100000@markov.math.uwaterloo.ca)
> >TERRY
> >I wanted to see what kind of answer you were going to give me and as I
> >suspected you seem to dodged around it very carefully. I have made no
> >assertions about God existence in this post what so ever. Since you
> >believe matter has always existed, does that mean you believe the Universe
> >has always existed, since it was reported just today what the age of the
> >Universe was suppose to be. Please explain???
>
> TILL
> By the way, I read that same article in today's newspaper, and it creates
> far more problems for you than it does me. The article stated that NASA
> scientists had determined the age of the universe to be from 12 to 18
> billion years. How do you square this with the fact that Genesis 1
> indicates that God created the "universe" after he created the earth? The
> earth was created the first day (1:1-4), but the "stars" were not made until
> the fourth day (1:16-19). The stars would be matter scattered throughout
> the universe. So is it your contention that the earth is 12 to 18 billion
> years old.
DANIEL
Hi, I'm very new here, so forgive me if I'm bringing up old material.
Till, I was kind of disappointed that you did take an evasive technique in
this response. I'm curious to know how you reconcile the idea of matter
always existing with there being a (reported) beginning to the unverse. Am
I missing something? Is there a theory that explains what happened before
the big bang? Was the big bang preceeded by a collapse of a universe
previous to it? I would assume there is some rational explanation, after
all, I don't see how a big bang could have occured from nothing at all.
Please explain if possible.
Daniel L