Trinity:A fraud

David Flandry errancy@infidels.org
Sun, 2 May 1999 19:44:51 -0400 (00925706691, 006701be94f5$c81e9b60$ee054d0c@oemcomputer) 


>

> > TILL

> > Well, gee, Sims, while we're not forgetting, let's not forget about the

> > resurrection. Would it be appropriate to say that if this one element of

>    the  Christian system is rendered disputable, or even false, then the

entire

> > system is demolished?  If you say no, I'll let you argue with the

apostle

> > Paul who said that if Christ has not been raised, then your faith is

vain

> (1 Cor. 15:17).

 > What you apparently can't see is that some Christian doctrines are so

> > central to this religious system that if those doctrines are shown to be

> > false or indefensible, then the Christian system is rendered virtually

> > worthless.

>

> Matthew Bell

> Whilst you are correct to state that the resurrection is, according to the

> Bible an essential to the Christian's faith, Sims initial response was to

> Bakke stating the same re: the Trinity. This is easily shown to be

> fallacious by noting the amount of large 'Christian' groups, e.g.. the

> Jehovah Witnesses (approx. 4.5million), and the Mormons, (approx.9million)

> who exist whilst denying the trinity doctrine.

>

> Thanks

> M.Bell


  DF, to TILL
  By Bell's logic one could believe in universalism and be a xian since
millions
  people who call themselves xian deny  that anyone will be sent to hell.