A Reiteration and Clarification of my Purpose

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

A

>Jason (foreverlive):

>>

>>The ONLY reason you bring my name up is because Jacob said that i referred

>>him to this list. You don't know Jacob or anything about him. Much the same

>>with me. You think that just because i am young that i am dumb. That is an

>>*opinion* (and you should know that opinions don't always equal truth). I

>>never said that i know more than people who have "been around the block a

>>few times". It's only a false assumption of yours.

>>

>>Those years as a preacher must have really soured you. I notice the same

>>behavior coming from your Christian counterparts in the church. Honestly, i

>>doubt that i could ever have a decent conversation with you. You think that

>>if a Christian refuses to give into your ideas about the Bible that they

>>are narrow-minded and impossible. When maybe, just maybe *you're* the one

>>being narrow. Have you ever stopped to think that you might just be wrong?

>>I'm not talking about when you were finding these "errancy" accounts in the

>>Bible. I'm talking about within that last day, week, month, or even year.

>>Are you humble about what you have found? I look at your posts and i see a

>>monolithical *NO*. I think about the actual truth of the Bible all the

>>time. But you only think of what you see as a lie. You are cumbersome to

>>yourself. You think yourself wise, when you just may be the fool. If the

>>person is being honest with themselves, the truth will always humble a

>>person. The fact that you show no humbleness in your manner gives me a

>>strong suspicion that you're wrong in what you've found. 

>>

>>I'm tired of your backlashing at me and unless it stops you will be going

>>into MY trash filter. My mail box is cluttered enough as it is. I can do

>>without your "sentiments".

>>

>>

>>PS-Who said that i was a "college student"?

>

>Ray

>Why don't you take the time Jason to read what you just wrote. It is full of

>unsubstantiated assertions and non sequiturs. It rambles on and frankly

>sounds much like a little kid saying his daddy can beat up your daddy.




Jason (foreverlive):

I think better that you should read it again. You're the perfect example of
what i explained there. There are no unsubstantiated assertaions, only
observations. It may seem to ramble because i was not talking to *you*. Did
you give that the slightest thought? This post proves otherwise. Especially
with that corny 'daddy' reference. (where did you come up with that one?)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]