Geisler vs Till (Luke's Accuracy)
Dave Gaban drrod@slip.net
Wed, 03 Mar 1999 17:16:37 -0800 (00920531797, 36DDDEF5.3EFD@slip.net)
G. R. Gaudreau wrote:
>
> SHERMAN
> The Bible is inerrant (in its original manuscripts...)!
>
> <snip>
>
> Dave G.
> And you know this...how?
>
> [grgaud]
> C'mon Dave... think, man, THINK! He knows this because the Bible
> tells him so. You see, Paul said that "All scripture is given by
> inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof,
> for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of
> God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works."
> (2Tim. 3:16)
>
> Now, since there are very minor copiest errors and variants in
> the copies of the "original" MSS, then it stands to reason that
> only the original MSS were divinely inspired. This is basic
> knoweldge Dave, and frankly, I'm surprised at your question.
>
Dave G.
Maybe Christians are just victims of the evil God Yahweh.
2 Chronicles 18:22 " So now the LORD has put a LYING spirit
in the mouths of these prophets of yours. Also 1 Kings 22:23
and 2 Thessalonians 2:11 "So for this reason GOD sends them a
powerful delusion SO THAT THEY WILL BELIEVE A LIE, 12 and so that
ALL WILL BE CONDEMNED who have not believed the truth...."
Maybe Paul was the lying spirit and the original MSS was the
"powerful delusion" so that God can get his kicks by sending
them all to Hell!