A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

---Jason Filley <absolute@relative.net> wrote:

>

> TILL

> > > 9.  The debate will be between Matthew Sherman and Farrell Till,

but other

> > > members of the Errancy list will be entitled to post their

reactions and

> > > comments. Sherman and Till, however, will have no obligation to

respond

> > > directly to any of these postings, although they will have the

right to do

> > > so if they wish.

> > >

> > SHERMAN

> > 9. No. I could possibly see where errancy list readers are

entitled to post

> > to the debate itself, but neither Till nor Sherman should respond

to any

> > such posting. It is further recommended that errancy readers

refrain from

> > doing so in the first place, for as they introduce a new line of

reasoning

> > for or against the resolution, they nullify the opportunity for

the debaters

> > to claim a similar argument as an original one. 

> 

> JASON

> Are you a member of this list, Sherman?

> 


Tim
I am willing to do (or not do) whatever it takes to get him to
subscribe because it is simply easier to follow the exchanges if
Till doesn't have to forward them.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Previous message: A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman
• Next message: A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]