A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

TILL

> > 9.  The debate will be between Matthew Sherman and Farrell Till, but other

> > members of the Errancy list will be entitled to post their reactions and

> > comments. Sherman and Till, however, will have no obligation to respond

> > directly to any of these postings, although they will have the right to do

> > so if they wish.

> >

> SHERMAN

> 9. No. I could possibly see where errancy list readers are entitled to post

> to the debate itself, but neither Till nor Sherman should respond to any

> such posting. It is further recommended that errancy readers refrain from

> doing so in the first place, for as they introduce a new line of reasoning

> for or against the resolution, they nullify the opportunity for the debaters

> to claim a similar argument as an original one. 


JASON
Are you a member of this list, Sherman?

• Previous message: A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman
• Next message: A Debate Proposal for Matt Sherman
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]