A comment

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>Jason:

>

>I can't see the love, depression, or fear. I can see what is done IN love,

>IN depression and IN fear, but i can't see those things physically. I can

>see the causes of those things, but i can't see those things. In other

>words, does a cause need a causer?

>

>POOBAH

>As was already pointed out by Till, now we add the fallacy of reification.

>

>I doubt I'll get any takers on my bet.



Jason:

Is this a way of getting around my question?

POOBAH
Until you present your argument in a logical fashion, there's nothing to
answer. If you can't, you have your answer; your argument is illogical. Look
up fallacy of reification and tell us why it does or does not apply.

You never did answer my questions about your "evolution" posting last week,
Jason, why was that? If you actually studied that matter, you would see how
you are being lied to by your leaders. I dare you to actually examine it.

B.

• Previous message: A comment
• Next message: A comment
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]