A comment
Farrell Till errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:50:02 -0700 (00929101802, 2.2.32.19990611065002.008f258c@midwest.net)
At 09:58 PM 6/10/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:34:30 -0400 "Rev. G. R. Gaudreau"
><grgaud@sprint.ca> writes:
>> >RevGaud
>> >What I meant was that your supposition was based on the speculation
>>
>> >"if existing...", that is, you said "if God exists it proves he
>> works
>> >in individual lives." You can't have it as proof that God works in
>> >people's lives while at the same time saying "if he exists."
>> >
>> >You're begging the questions: What "proof" do you have that "God is
>> a
>> >persoanl God?" And what proof do you have that he works in
>> individual
>> >lives? Personal experience is not proof that God exists and it is
>> not
>> >proof that God is a "personal God". It isn't proof of anything but
>> a
>> >personal experience. It's all very subjective.
>>
>>
>> Jason:
>> Is murder subjective? Is rape subjective? Those are personal
>> experiences to.
>> Using the logic you've used, i could say that love doesn't exist. I
>> could
>> say that depression doesn't exist. I could say that fear doesn't
>> exist.
>> Those are personal experiences to.
>
>STB
>Go brother!
>
TILL
Shawn, I'll suggest that you too need to read a logic book and find out what
the fallacy of reification is.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net