A comment

Shawn T Bellon errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:58:11 -0500 (00929087891, 19990610.221055.-482735.9.sbellon@juno.com)



On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:34:30 -0400 "Rev. G. R. Gaudreau"
<grgaud@sprint.ca> writes:

> >RevGaud
> >What I meant was that your supposition was based on the speculation
>
> >"if existing...", that is, you said "if God exists it proves he
> works
> >in individual lives." You can't have it as proof that God works in
> >people's lives while at the same time saying "if he exists."
> >
> >You're begging the questions: What "proof" do you have that "God is
> a
> >persoanl God?" And what proof do you have that he works in
> individual
> >lives? Personal experience is not proof that God exists and it is
> not
> >proof that God is a "personal God". It isn't proof of anything but
> a
> >personal experience. It's all very subjective.
>
>
> Jason:
> Is murder subjective? Is rape subjective? Those are personal
> experiences to.
> Using the logic you've used, i could say that love doesn't exist. I
> could
> say that depression doesn't exist. I could say that fear doesn't
> exist.
> Those are personal experiences to.
STB Go brother!
> RevGaud
> Jason please! No offense but this ia really lame. Murder and rape
> are
> crimes that can be seen by multiple witnesses and as such can be
> proven beyong doubt, or at least with reasonable certainty. They
> don't compare with an invisible God no one has ever seen or heard.
> And they don't compare with the so-called experience of having "God
> work in your heart." As personal as rape and murder may be, at least
>
> I can see them or feel them and so can multiple witnesses, unlike
> having "God work in youe heart," which is purely subjective. C'mon
> man, THINK!
STB What does seeing those "crimes" have to do with anything? Why are those things bad?
> JASON
> Do you believe in moral absolutes? If you don't and think that it's
> relative, then you deny an absolute's defense. If you say that moral
> absolutes do not exist, it's a contradiction because that in itself
> is an
> absolute. Morality is personal experience to. Does that mean it's
> limited
> to one person?
>
> RevGaud
> The morality merry-go-round AGAIN?!?!? No way I'm getting into this.
>
> Just deal with my above reply, please.
STB Rev, your above reply is insufficient and a contradiction. Shawn T. Be'llon <>< Faith In Yahweh, Inc Col. 3:12-14