"evangelist" biggy

errancy@infidels.org errancy@infidels.org
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:38:30 EDT (00931405110, f4052b3f.24b530e6@aol.com) 


> >APOSTLE KURT

>  >I believe you missed at least two previous posts, in which to people 

stated 

> 

>  >that they were atheists not because the Bible has errors, but because 

they 

>  >have no reason to believe in gawd. 

>  

>  bigwheel

>  Yep I musta missed it. Tell them God says they have plenty of reasons to

>  believe in Him..with their failure to believe being unexcusable. 

>  

>   Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world

>  are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his

>  eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 


APOSTLE KURT
Speaking for myself, and perhaps representing a fellow heretic or two, 

1 ) What are the plenty of reasons for me to believe in your baby-killing, 
homophobic, adultery-loving, slavery and slaughter-condoning, and yet somehow 
just, Gawd?
2 ) " . . .failure to believe being unexcusable."  Now, if this were true, 
then God would not be one to "cause delusions" and neither would he allow 
misinterpretations of any kind come out of his Word, now would he?  He is 
after all, omnipotent, and therefore COULD HAVE made all the copies of the 
Bible inerrant.  But he didn't, even you agree, so your Gawd intentionally 
caused Confusion.  Now, if he did this, and thus made his Book incredible, it 
is suddenly OUR fault that we don't want to believe in the nonsense?

Once again, you avoid the questions:
1 ) Which particular verses in the Bible are copyist errors, since you agree 
that they exist?
2 ) What is your proof that the original copies of the Bible exist today, and 
that they are inerrant, and that they are in custody of the Vatican?
3 ) Where is your proof of this Hell you are trying to scare us with?
4 ) Where is your proof that your Gawd even exists?  
5 ) Where is your proof that the KJV is "divinely inspired?"

Now, I do sincerely hope you will actuall AT LEAST TRY to answer these rather 
perplexing questions, as opposed to just ignoring them and snipping them out 
of your replies, as you have done when they were asked previously.