Biblical/Jesus errors

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hello, Lee!

At 12:55 AM 1/4/99 -0800, Lee Markland wrote:

>At 08:15 PM 1/2/99 +0000, Crea wrote:

>

>>CREA

>>    Again, the  Marcan mention of Abiathar, if valid, only provides the

>>icing on the cake of errancy, since Matthew, Mark & Luke all agree in the

>>details which Jesus provides in his recounting of the episode recorded in

>>First Samuel 21:1-15 & 22:1-2, and it is painfully obvious that Jesus either

>>was unfamiliar with the actual text or else was deliberately distorting the

>>material to suit his own purposes.  As I stated in an earlier posting:

>

>Lee

>

>Doesn't this statement presuppose that Iesus was in fact historical. An issue

>on which I throw serious doubt.



CREA
    No more than pointing out the flaws in logical argumentation found in a
particular Sherlock Holmes adventure presupposes the historicity of Sherlock
Holmes.


With Mettaa,

Joseph Crea
<Joseph.Crea@worldnet.att.net>

• Previous message: Biblical/Jesus errors
• Next message: Biblical/Jesus errors
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]