Biblical/Jesus errors

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hello, JILO!

At 11:47 PM 1/1/99 -0800, owner-errancy@infidels.org forwarded the following
post from JILO, who wrote:

>

>

>JILO

>Contradictions are bound to appear in an 'evesdropping'  endeavor such as

>reading the account of a conversation which does not include us.. ie.

>Jesus/pharisees The evesdropper doesnt know the language, the culture, the

>setting, the common usage of words or  in general the mode of communication.

>He is bound to misunderstand either or both speakers and if he so desires

>decides 'ahhhah another contradiction'



CREA
    This is fascinating!  Then you are admitting that EVERY reading of the
conversations in the NT are BOUND to include misinterpretations of the
material, inasmuch as even the most skilled contemporary linguist or
Biblical scholar, since they were NOT included in or present at the
conversation?  Then just how, pray tell, does one go about determining what
the conversations MEAN beyond the obvious?  


With Mettaa,

Joseph Crea
<Joseph.Crea@worldnet.att.net>

• Previous message: Biblical/Jesus errors
• Next message: Biblical/Jesus errors
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]