God proving his existence

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>TOM:

>Each syllogism would be different for each argument.

>How about the following two (based on a previous post):

>

>1. Nothing comes from nothing.

>2. The universe is something.

>3. All things that begin to exist come from something.

>4. The universe began to exist.

>

>Therefore:  Something brought the unverse into existence.  By nature

>that something must be timeless (to bring time into existence), all

>powerful (to be able to do so), changeless (to invoke physical law),

>intelligent (to fine tune the aspects of the big bang, etc...

>

>

>1. Irreducibly complex things require a designer.

>2. The cell is irreducibly complex.

>

>Therefore;  The cell was designed.



|rainwater|

Sorry to add more to this thread, especially since I may be
stepping on a philosophical land mine with the following comment.

Wouldn't God be irreducibly complex?  I don't know how
much more bluntly I could ask that.  It just kind of jumped out
at me.  Go figure...

--
aaron rainwater

"And isn't sanity really just a one trick pony anyway?
I mean, all you get is one trick!  Rational thinking.
But when you're good and crazy, oooh!! The sky's the
limit!"  -- The Tick

• Previous message: God proving his existence
• Next message: God proving his existence
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]