Problems with the Virgin Birth Story

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On 10 Feb 99, at 16:29, JAlw@aol.com wrote:


> In a message dated 99-02-10 14:21:49 EST, you write:

> 

> << In the case of the burials, you were making a claim which ran counter to

> best

>  available evidence, even before Jason F. posted his information. You had

> people

>  perfectly qualified to know such things (Tyler, Crea, Achilles) both telling

> you

>  and providing some primary source documents on the subject as support for

> their-

>  and the general scholarly posi >>

> ================

> Joe Alward:

> 

> So, to question the assertions of "experts" is an extraordinary act, requiring

> extraordinary license to do so?


Achilles
No, Joe, it is not. And I won't claim the attribution above that I am 
"perfectly qualified to know such things" either. But when I posted what I 
remembered to be the case, and suggested that you qualify someone who really 
would "perfectly qualified to know such things," and even went to the extent of 
giving you quite detailed instructions on how to do that, quickly and easily, 
and you replied by snipping and ignoring that suggestion entirely, well, that 
was the point where I just decided you weren't worth any further replies on the 
matter. 

In vino veritas

/Achilles     achillesz@usa.net

All rights reserved.

Random thought for the moment:

    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing. It is a waste of time
    and it annoys the pig. 
           -- Lazarus Long in Time Enough for Love

• Previous message: crucifixion burials (bounce)
• Next message: crucifixion burials (bounce)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]