An Introduction and a Question

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hello!

My name is Sam Gibson, though some on the list may know me as Cygnus. I host
a web site with discussion boards known as Cygnus' Study - Debunking the
Bible and take the issue of biblical fallibility very seriously. Stop by and
check it out if you have some spare time - the link is below.

Now the question. How does this list define inerrant? Are we talking about
any small mistake in the Bible making it errant? If so, we can quickly point
out a couple of dozen, refute the apologetic response, roll up the carpet
and go home.

Or are we talking about theological in/errancy where a doctrine must be
shown to be errant to remove the ludicrous notion that the Bible is perfect?


Just checking in before proceeding.

Thanks in advance!
-
Sincerely,
Sam Gibson
-
cygnus@cygnus-study.com
http://www.cygnus-study.com
-
"You might have lived a good life as an exemplary Christian,
only to be met at the gates of Heaven by Mohammed.
That's called fate."
-Neil Peart, drummer and lyricist from Rush

• Previous message: The No-Burial Theory
• Next message: An Introduction and a Question
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]