Martyrdom 2

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On 5 Feb 99, at 23:37, Jason Carter wrote:


> At 08:26 PM 2/5/99 -0800, you wrote:

> >CARTER

> >>1.  "Yes, we want extra-biblical (hearsay) evidence to prove the

> >>historical validity of the martyrdom accounts."

> >

> ><snip>

> >

> >MIKE M

> >

> >With "logic" like this, I hope Jason continues to post on the Errancy

> >list for as long as I'm around. As a (fairly) recent deconvert, his

> >evasions are the best evidence that inerrancy is indefensible. Fisher

> >should have a field day with this one! Extra-biblical = hearsay? Maybe if

> >I read his post again, I'll get it ;-)

> 

> CARTER

> Well Mike, please show me how this is illogical? I assume you undestand

> what "logic" is, so will you kindly show me how refrencing non-biblical

> historians (who were not privy to seeing Christ and specific martyrdoms)

> as hearsay is illogical?

> 

> I also LOVE how you supply us with no evidence whatsoever with your

> laughable claims for "evasion", and I will also point out that we are not

> discussing errancy at the moment. 

> 

> -Jason


Achilles
Let me get this straight, you are claiming that only Christians witnessed the 
martyrdoms of the Apostles? 

/Achilles     achillesz@usa.net

All rights reserved.

Random thought for the moment:

    The itch to be a world saver should not be scratched; it rarely does
    any good and can drastically shorten your life. 
           -- Lazarus Long in Time Enough for Love

• Previous message: Martyrdom 2
• Next message: Martyrdom 2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]