Martyrdom 2

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 08:26 PM 2/5/99 -0800, you wrote:

>CARTER

>>1.  "Yes, we want extra-biblical (hearsay) evidence to prove the historical

>>validity of the martyrdom accounts."

>

><snip>

>

>MIKE M

>

>With "logic" like this, I hope Jason continues to post on the Errancy list

>for as long as I'm around. As a (fairly) recent deconvert, his evasions are

>the best evidence that inerrancy is indefensible. Fisher should have a field

>day with this one! Extra-biblical = hearsay? Maybe if I read his post again,

>I'll get it ;-)


CARTER
Well Mike, please show me how this is illogical? I assume you undestand what
"logic" is, so will you kindly show me how refrencing non-biblical
historians (who were not privy to seeing Christ and specific martyrdoms) as
hearsay is illogical?

I also LOVE how you supply us with no evidence whatsoever with your
laughable claims for "evasion", and I will also point out that we are not
discussing errancy at the moment. 

-Jason

• Previous message: Martyrdom 2
• Next message: Martyrdom 2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]