A Challenge to Farrell Till

Brian Dean bridean@worldnet.att.net
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 22:55:30 -0500 (00918208530, 19990205035251.ESYW23934@briandea) 

AT http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_ntb1.htm

    Till could bring up any of the points raised in the discussions here.
One I found
interesting was in a table, loosely recreated for the one line entry below:

Item                    Matthew, Mark, Luke                    John

Virgin birth       Mentioned in Matt, Luke        Rejected (John 1:45)


    When I checked, sure enough John 1:45 refers to Jesus as of the seed of
David and the son of Joseph. That's it.

BRIDEAN
Ah, come on Micheal!  You should know by now that when it comes to
the Bible that "seed" doesn't really mean "seed" and "son" doesn't
really mean "son".  Perhaps "David" doesn't really mean "David" either.