Genesis 2:19

Farrell Till jftill@midwest.net
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:24:24 -0800 (00917835864, 2.2.32.19990131202424.0088c640@midwest.net)


At 12:54 AM 1/31/99 -0500, Jason Carter wrote:


>CARTER
>What remaining issue? The issue was whether or not a contradiction existed.
>It did not.
>
TILL I finally took the time to read Turkel's cut-and-paste job. No, wait a minute that isn't exactly right. It's more of a plagiarism job than a cut-and-paste job. Turkel follows his usual route of presenting himself as one who knows all about nuances in the Hebrew language, but my 28-part reply to his attempt to explain away the inconsistency in 2 Kings 10:30 and Hosea 1:4 elicited an admission from him that he is not knowledgeable in Hebrew. Hence, we can only assume that all of his talk about what this word and that word in Genesis 2 really meant is merely undocumented comments that he is again trying to pass off as his own. I assume that Carter is the "Christian member of Farrell Till's errancy discussion board" who "passed on" to Turkel the postings of "the local thralls of the Grand High Weasel" on the matter of Genesis 2, so I will urge Carter to help us find out just who the real weasel is. I'll ask Carter again to invite Turkel to accept my on-line debate challenge in a forum like what we have here on Errancy, where EVERYTHING that is said on the subject by both sides will be posted for all to consider. Such a forum will prevent the tactic that is very much in evidence on Turkel's web site, where he selectively quotes what he thinks he can best comment on and leave unquoted material that he doesn't want his readers to see. Unless Turkel will do this, Carter, some of us just might think that he is the real Grand High Weasel. Before you send this challenge to him again, Carter, don't get your hopes up. He has refused this challenge umpteen times before on other issues, so he will probably refuse it again. I'll say this much about Turkel. He at least has enough common sense to know that it isn't smart to get involved in debates on biblical inerrancy, where he can't play his "smorgasbord" game. Other would-be apologists haven't been so smart, and they have gotten burned badly. Turkel at least knows that if he doesn't get close to the fire, he can't get burned. Farrell Till Skepticism, Inc. jftill@midwest.net