Shaking Matt's Faith

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>Joe Alward:

>

>I will try to do that later, if that's all right with you.  The intent of my

>question was not to allege that Matt *is* ignoring strong evidence; instead,

>it was to determine whether he would consider anyone who would allege Bible

>error to be one who "begs the question of NT errancy".  More to the point, I

>wanted to know whether he could even *imagine* evidence which cause him to

>admit that the the bible contains significant error.   I suspect that there

>could not exist even hypothetical evidence which could shake the faith of the

>believer, and I want to test to see if this were true for Matt Bell .

>

>Perhaps you wouldn't mind taking this question? Can you conceive of any form

>of evidence that would cause your faith in the inerrancy of the Bible to be

>shaken? 

>

>After you answer that, if you want, I'll try to point to a passage for

which a

>strong case can be made for Bible error.


CARTER
I don't think you quite understand my position on inerrancy, but to answer
your question, yes am I very open a "strong case for Bible error." That's
what I'm here for Joe :)

-Jason

• Previous message: Shaking Matt's Faith
• Next message: Shaking Matt's Faith
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]