Not Up to Fatima & black holes
Brian Dean errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:04:55 -0400 (00934455895, 37B26407.CE147EC3@worldnet.att.net)
> >> Ray
> >> Hunters do show themselves to lions (carefully) because their technology
> >> (guns) is superior to the lion's (claws and jaws). IMO aliens from other
> >> solar systems would be so far beyond our technology that there is no way
> >> they would be the least afraid of our knowing they were here. Yes, they
> >> would have their defenses up (as do lion hunters) but they would be in
> >> control.
> >
> >BRIDEAN
> >Oh, I forgot to mention the one incident in Yellowstone park where a photographer
> >decided to follow a bear. Certainly the photographer had much better technology
> >with him (35mm camera) than what the bear had (claws and jaws) but it didn't
> >seem to help him much since the bear killed him.
> >
> >In other words, have you even taken into account the idea that the aliens might
> >not even possess a weapon when they come to visit? I can think of reasons
> >why they might not even have weapons. Didn't you say somewhere that
> >skepticism is based on reason?
>
> Ray
> If these aliens haven't figured out that they could easily "show themselves"
> without fear they are idiots and would not likely have been able to develope
> the high technology they obviously have. They supposedly have been around
> now for many decades and are still examining orifices. Talk about slow
> learners.
>
BRIDEAN
I see you are still making assumptions about what kind of technology these
aliens have. I really don't see why you aren't working for NASA. Don't you
think mankind would benefit greatly from the knowledge you have of such
technologies?
Why would the mere fact that they can travel great distances mean that they
can show themselves without fear? I can travel great distances compared to
a Rhino with my car. But I would be scared shitless when faced with an angry
Rhino even if I had my car.
Ok, why don't you let the cat out of the bag then. If aliens possessed the
technology to travel between stars, then what technology would they have that
would blow our weapons away? Can you name at least one thing that they would
DEFINITELY have? Let's call it X. So what is this X that they would have that
would make us say, "Oh, oh, these aliens have X! We better not mess with them!"
> Ray
> The illogic of it is one part of the argument, but the fact that there has
> been no real tangible evidence is another. I conclude that the explanation
> of the phenomena (UFO sightings and abduction tales) can be explained far
> more simply as hoaxes, ignorance and/or fantasies than as visitors from
> another solar system. This is reasonable skepticism and you must know it.
> Your continued argument is no doubt an effort to cast skeptics in a bad
> light because they are skeptical of the miracles in the bible. Of course
> being skeptical of those is supremely reasonable, while being skeptical of
> your having seen a cat in the alley is not.
BRIDEAN
Well, I could have been hallucinating when I saw a cat in the alley. Once every
two years I have a schizophrenic event where I litterally hear someone calling my
name. So there you go, it could merely be evidence that my schizophrenia is
getting worse. See there, I really can't prove that I really saw a cat in an alley.
Can you?