The exception to the rule of bad grammar = bad communication.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> Matthew Bell

> Well, I can think of at least one person, 'who cares,' and as a hint it is

> not me. As far as I am concerned so long as a person's post is readable and

> understandable then there is no problem. For example, I looked at Farrell

> error and knew what he meant to say so no problem. However, there is a

> problem when that same individual insists that other people who don't meet

> his standard of writing are shoddy thinkers, who are unable to communicate

> their ideas effectively. Such is nothing more than an attempt to subtely

> 'poison the well', hence the reason I pointed out the error.


BRIDEAN
My sentiments exactly.  Since Farrell is unable as of yet to produce the simple
proof that all groups of prime order p are cyclic he must also be a shoddy
thinker.  After all, it is a pretty simple proof really.

• Previous message: The exception to the rule of bad grammar = bad communication.
• Next message: The exception to the rule of bad grammar = bad communication.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]