[MCAD] Not Up to Fatima?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> ATTORNEY REVEREND FLUFFY

> Not to put too fine a point on discrediting BriDean's defense by parallel or

> similar circumstance (i.e., "The Fatima miracles must have occurred because

> cars roll uphill in Ohio"),


BRIDEAN
Another fine example of atheist logic.  Where have I ever claimed that the
Fatima miracles are true BECAUSE cars roll uphill?  No what I am really
claiming is that the Fatima miracles are true because the statement, "BriDean's
defense by parallel or similar circumstance (i.e., "The Fatima miracles must have
occurred because cars roll uphill in Ohio"), " is a fine example of atheist logic.

• Previous message: [MCAD] Not Up to Fatima?
• Next message: [MCAD] Not Up to Fatima?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]