IN THE NEWS (SHROUD OF TURIN)
Brian Dean errancy@infidels.org
Tue, 03 Aug 1999 22:34:32 -0400 (00933752072, 37A7A6B8.2299CB10@worldnet.att.net)
> POOBAH
> Yes Terrry, but if the results are 50% off, then it could still be 14th
> century (Just trying one of your arguments on you, Terry, to see how you
> like it).
>
> How can you possibly trust this dating, Terry, when you discount every
> dating method contrary to your beliefs?
>
> TERRY
> His co-author, Alan Whanger, says it is a testament of the validity of
> Jesus
> of Nazareth.
>
> POOBAH
> <SARCASM>
> Well, I see these are responsible researchers, not prone to hyperbole, who
> draw only the conclusions available from the data.
> </SARCASM>
>
> TERRY
> First of all Poobah, Terry has two (r)s not three and second, I for one am
> very skeptical of this Shroud of Turin. I posted this information to see
> what kind of reaction I would get. I did notice with interest, the part
> about the carbon 14 dating.
>
> By the way, do you guys just set around staring at the computer screen
> waiting for messages to pop up so you can attack them. </SARCASM>
BRIDEAN
Well, I guess if Poobah can't spell "Terry" correctly then he can't be a
real atheist. That makes his arguments against the Shroud suspect as
well.