A Request....
Squirrel errancy@infidels.org
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 23:15:57 +0200 (00924142557, 000401be872c$a82a2e40$c1319d3e@Noname)
Hi All,
I have just begun a debate with a christian, and have noticed (thanks
aaron) that alot of the questions are errancy type deals. If the list would
permit me, I would like to submit them to you all. This way we all can
comment upon them, and offer answers for both sides and learn. I know I
would learn alot from your input. Some of them are not errancy related in a
pure sense, but have relevance to other questions.
LMK before I submit the list.
Thanks
Squirrel
" When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced.
Live so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice"
Squirrel 3:16
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Terry <terry@bluebonnet.net>
An: errancy@infidels.org <errancy@infidels.org>
Datum: Mittwoch, 14. April 1999 22:05
Betreff: Re: Off topic Evolution question to Pomery,
>
>
>
>DEREK
>Why do I get the feeling we are going in circles.
>We present evidence.
>You claim links that you NEVER POST.
>We move on to another already covered topic.
>As we discussed before, there are many stages in the formation of modern
>living organisms - from self-replicating protien, to free RNA/DNA, to
>membrane protected sequences. And there are forms of self-replicating
>structures today which do not fall into either living or non-living
>categories. Is a virus alive or not alive? It depends on the definition.
>The development of life is a continuum, the dichotomy is in your head.
>
>
>TERRY
>It was not meant to be circular although I have notice some post do tend
>to evolve in that direction and not just mine. I did see the links,
>however I will have to find where they are. Surely you don't doubt there
>are links to refute evolution on the internet somewhere. As to whether
>you agree with what they said is altogether a different story. As for
>the circular comment, any debate on evolution might just be that,
>circular. You presenting something in support, and someone else
>presenting something to refute. You with your expert authorities, and
>someone else with theirs. It is also quite off topic. I only wanted to
>know the answer to the last question out of curiosity, that is all.
>
>I saw your last post and the reasons are many Derek not just one or two.
>Why do you ask, is it so you may have something to attack, that is what
>this whole thing is about to me. I am not into the attacking mode. If
>you wish to remain an Atheist so be it, but I can almost assure you that
>with everything in life, I have experience so far, I will always believe
>in God. Now you don't have to agree with this, you have your life to live
>and I have mine. I can live with you not believing in God, just as you
>should be able to live with me believing in God.
>
> I would like to now concentrate on Lee's question. I have a number of
>threads this evening that have been posted to me and I have tried to
>answer a few of them but probably not with much satisfaction to those that
>ask. I have a rather large project to finish in my yard, although I am
>taking time out, to run back and forth to my computer. (kind of
>addicting)
>