A matter of perpective to Derek

Derek Pomery errancy@infidels.org
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:17:40 -0400 (EDT) (00924135460, Pine.LNX.3.95.990414151640.4145D-100000@helix.cs.cuc.edu) 


> DEREK

> Actually, I think it's a case of *refusing* to see it, and throwing it

> out; since you had no good reason to reject it or explain it away.

> Failure to come up with a viable alternative, yet refusing to accept the

> evidence is not a coming up with a different perspective on it.

> 

> TERRY

> You do not know me well enough to say that, so you are merely expressing

> your opinion.  Maybe you don't feel there is enough reason to reject it,

> but I do.  Maybe I should turn it around and say I don't see enough reason

> to accept it


DEREK
So you do not see enough REASON to accept it?
This emplies objective REASONED logic.
Would you mind expressing how you came to this and what it is?