(was Out of the Cellar)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Terry wrote:

> 

> [grgaud]

> I don't have to assume anything, Terry, because I KNOW you can't

> answer it. If you could you would have answered it a long time ago

> because this question has been asked many times before. You're just

> afraid of the controversy it will raise. Skeptics will ask how come

> your version is different than, say, the Baptist's version, or the

> Presbeterian's version and you'll have to explain why and they'll

> question you some more until you just give up and use the excuse that

> that's just what you believe and you're not obligated to answer any

> questions. Sound familiar anyone?

> 

> TERRY

> If you say so.


Dave G.
Terry, if you are not willing to argue your point, why are you wasting
band width?  Answer the god damned questions to your assertions or 
admit they are nothing more than your personal opinion!

• Previous message: (was Out of the Cellar)
• Next message: My ideas for your errancy tract
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]