An Intentional Double Posting

Farrell Till errancy@infidels.org
Fri, 09 Apr 1999 10:59:39 -0700 (00923698779, 2.2.32.19990409175939.008a9230@midwest.net) 

At 03:47 AM 4/9/99 +0000, you wrote:

>Hello, Farrell!

>

>At 10:35 PM 4/8/99 -0700, you wrote:

>>At 08:27 PM 4/8/99 -0400, G. R. Gaudreau wrote:

>>>Farrell,

>>>I just noticed in my reply to Jacob, concerning his indignation over

>>>the flippency on the list, that I got two letters from the server at

>>>Infidels. I didn't hit the "reply to" button, only the "Reply"

>>>button, I'm positive about that, so I should have received only one

>>>letter but I receivd two of them. Something is wrong at the server

>>>end. Perhaps you should let them know this.

>>>

>>

>>TILL

>>I am intentionally double posting my reply to this so that everyone will see

>>what happens when "reply to all" is chosen.  If you will look at the address

>>line above, you will see that selection of the "reply to all" option

>>resulted in errancy@infidels.org being inserted twice on the "To" line.

>>Some are saying that they are receiving double postings that I am receiving

>>only one copy of.  If you receive a double posting, check the "To" line to

>>see if errancy@infidels.org appears twice.  If it doesn't, then the reason

>>why you are receiving two copies must be a fault of your e-mail service and

>>not the errancy list.  I can see no reason why everyone on the list would

>>not receive two copies if the posting was really double addressed.

>

>

>CREA

>    Strange, so far I've only received one copy of this.

>


TILL
Me too, but my copy had errancy@infidels.org twice on the "To" line, so I
have no explanation for why some people are receiving double copies of some
postings.

Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net