An Intentional Double Posting

Joseph Crea errancy@infidels.org
Fri, 9 Apr 1999 03:47:29 +0000 (00923647649, 19990409034729.CZSR14632@LOCALNAME)


Hello, Farrell!

At 10:35 PM 4/8/99 -0700, you wrote:

>At 08:27 PM 4/8/99 -0400, G. R. Gaudreau wrote:
>>Farrell,
>>I just noticed in my reply to Jacob, concerning his indignation over
>>the flippency on the list, that I got two letters from the server at
>>Infidels. I didn't hit the "reply to" button, only the "Reply"
>>button, I'm positive about that, so I should have received only one
>>letter but I receivd two of them. Something is wrong at the server
>>end. Perhaps you should let them know this.
>>
>
>TILL
>I am intentionally double posting my reply to this so that everyone will see
>what happens when "reply to all" is chosen. If you will look at the address
>line above, you will see that selection of the "reply to all" option
>resulted in errancy@infidels.org being inserted twice on the "To" line.
>Some are saying that they are receiving double postings that I am receiving
>only one copy of. If you receive a double posting, check the "To" line to
>see if errancy@infidels.org appears twice. If it doesn't, then the reason
>why you are receiving two copies must be a fault of your e-mail service and
>not the errancy list. I can see no reason why everyone on the list would
>not receive two copies if the posting was really double addressed.
CREA Strange, so far I've only received one copy of this. With Mettaa, Joseph Crea <Joseph.Crea@worldnet.att.net>