(Ron) 'Sincere' seekers. . .

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Atribution lost:

> > > > Ron,

> > > > So what if it has to do with sex?


Jeff:

> > >That's our entire point, I think.  For a large set of things, in which

> > >sex is included, we think there should be a loud "so what", and you make

> > >a big deal of it.

> > >

> > >Without anything but appeal to authority plus contradictory statements

> > >about what is 'natural', the relationship between what 'happens in nature'

> > >(Heck, I've read about homosexual behavior in cats!) and what 'natural

> > >law' dictates.  Need I go on?

> > >

> > >Speaking about contradictory statements, did you ever actually figure

> > >a way to save your anti-birth control argument from contradiction?


 
RON:

> > FINALLY someone admits atheism is about sex. The Big Guy just spoils

> > all your "fun" and the presence of Christians keeps reminding you of the

> > fact. There is no contradiction in the Church's argument against birth

> > "control", you are just being illogical because you don't like the

> > limitations.


SJANE:

> Ron, where did Jeff admit that atheism is about sex?  Putting words in

> people's mouths again?


JEFF:

What I said:

|That's our entire point, I think.  For a large set of things, in which

|sex is included, we think there should be a loud "so what", and you make

|a big deal of it.


What Ron apparently heard:

|I think ... large things ... sex is included ... should be ... loud ...

|big deal ...


Jeff
-- 
\/ http://www.slashdot.org/                      Jeff Epler jepler@inetnebr.com
God made machine language; all the rest is the work of man.

• Previous message: (Ron) 'Sincere' seekers. . .
• Next message: (Ron) Oxygen on the moon (How much more off topic can I get?)]]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]