'Sincere' seekers. . .
Jeff Epler jepler@inetnebr.com
Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:36:17 -0500 (00906752177, 19980925093617.45588@falcon.inetnebr.com)
On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 10:02:36AM -0700, bridean wrote:
> > RON
> > I think the only reasons above that hold any salt are that arguing
> > about it is fun or that you feel you must impart what you consider to be
> > the Truth. I still fail to see how Christianity is threatening to you
> > except that it makes you feel convicted, the usual area of particular
> > tenderness being that of sexuality. But atheists keep assuring me it has
> > nothing to do with sex. So just how does christianity or the "moral
> > majority" threaten you or your lifestyle?
Ron,
So what if it has to do with sex?
That's our entire point, I think. For a large set of things, in which
sex is included, we think there should be a loud "so what", and you make
a big deal of it.
Without anything but appeal to authority plus contradictory statements
about what is 'natural', the relationship between what 'happens in
nature' (Heck, I've read about homosexual behaviour in cats!) and
what 'natural law' dictates. Need I go on?
Speaking about contradictory statements, did you ever actually figure a
way to save your anti-birth control argument from contradiction?
Jeff
--
\/ jepler@inetnebr.com http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jepler/ (0|1(01*0)*1)+