(Ron) Definition of Inerrancy

Brian Dean bridean@worldnet.att.net
Fri, 04 Sep 1998 22:57:33 -0400 (00904982253, 35F0A89D.DD5C59D7@worldnet.att.net)



> >> TILL
> >> Hebrews 4:15 claimed that "we" have a high priest [Jesus] who has
> been in
> >> all points tempted as "we" have, yet without sin. Now if Jesus was
> indeed
> >> tempted in all points as "we" have, then he surely experienced some
> moments
> >> when, for example, he saw a pretty woman and thought that sexual
> relations
> >> with her would be a pleasurable or exciting experience. (Maybe he
> had a
> >> yearning for Mary Magdalene at times.) Fisher is simply claiming that
> the
> >> temptation cannot occur without a mental fixation on the act that the
> person
> >> is tempted to do. If there is no fixation, then there can be no
> temptation.
> >> You, of course, say otherwise, so all that we want you to do is
> explain to
> >> us how that Jesus could have been tempted "in all points as we are"
> unless
> >> he had experienced mental fixations or images of involvement in the
> sins he
> >> was tempted to commit.
> >>
> RON
> OK Till, let me give you an example. Some guy cuts me off in traffic
> (my BIGGEST source of temptation. If I was Bryce I'd be offing half the
> people on the road due to my overpowering instincts!). If I try to
> forget about it and let go of the anger I've been tempted only. If I
> start fantasizing how I could follow him to his house and the terrible
> things I could do to him I would be sinning. Giving in to the temptation
> is sinning, not the temptation itself. Do you get the difference now?
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com