The necessity of suffering (to any Christian)

glenn civello g.civello@oit.umass.edu
Tue, 01 Sep 1998 13:14:13 -0400 (00904688053, 004201bdd5cb$f236d8c0$75b37780@glenn-civ)


Michael Vaugin wrote (in part):


> I understand the Christian position on why Jesus' death was necessary.
Well, I never could understand that Christian position. What is this business about "sin" being passed on to all of humankind, anyway? Impossible! It's a hocus pocus, flim flam explanation of ignorant ancients speculating on why shit happens! Even if it were possible to impute a couple of human's "sins" on to the rest of the humanity, it still wouldn't make sense. Where's the justice in punishing the whole human race? And then having ones son killed for atonement demonstrates Ohhhh, such love! For those of us that are rational, anything that doesn't make sense is (probably) nonsense. I've said it before but I'll say it again, the Christian god-man had it pretty good as far crucifixions go - a few lousy hours on a cross and it was over. Others have had to live through days of torture; myriads of humanity have suffered, many times more. And, things haven't changed - except in the "la la land" of Christian minds - since his "saving" humankind. A real sacrifice btw, would have been for him to be exiled to earth. But no, instead he gets ever lasting happiness with his daddy or he IS his daddy or however that goes. Anyway, if that were the case, _I_ would be impressed and, of course, a believer. GCC