A Check of Paula Kord's Posting to Me

Matthew Bell mbkbell@aapi.co.uk
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:53:08 +0100 (00908236388, 19981012185632328.AAA232@mbell.aapi.co.uk)



> TILL
> My explanation above is satisfactory for any reasonable person who isn't
> engaged in an obvious vendetta against me. When I forwarded PK's message
> that an unnamed member of your list sent to me, I stated that although PK
> had not sent the posting herself, she had forwarded CCBE postings to me. I
> thought that this was a correct statement, because I recalled having seen
> the name. When I went back through past postings, I found that she had sent
> to me the message that contained your witch-hunting questionnaire, so I
> posted a correction. In other words, Matt, I made a mistake, and that
> should be sufficient for anyone to understand, because people do make
> mistakes. Whether you believe me or not is immaterial. I don't really
> care. Who would care whether a buffoon like you who is engaged in witch
> hunting of ludicrous extemes believes him/her or not?
M.BELL Nice try Farrell. Truth is I don't have any reason to believe you, and I suspect that those who read the recent events with first Adnan and now P.K. will not believe you either.
>
> BELL
> > Keep it up Farrell, my
> >web page is growing steadily. As for identifying her name to the list I ask
you
> >to send to me the post I submitted to the errancy list doing so? I didn't,
you
> >did. My post was sent to you privately, you could have protected her
identity
> >as you did prevously. Another lie.
> >
>
> TILL
> Yes, you are right. That was an error on my part. As I was writing my
> response to this, I should have remembered that you were sending most of
> your postings to me privately now. I am so habituated to clicking reply and
> then striking the key to put the Errancy address into the "to" window that I
> forgot that I could have concealed her identity by changing Paula Kord to
> Pxxxx Kxxx as I had done in the other posting. That's what happened, it was
> an error on my part, and whether you accept that or not is also immaterial
> to me.
M.BELL Yeah right, sure it was. The only one's who will be fooled by your explanation are those with a vested interest in doing so.
> As for your steadily growing web page, I hope it keeps growing, because you
> do more damage to your position than I could ever do. You still don't see
> it, do you? You won't even accept the opinions of your own list members
> about this.
M.BELL Yes, soon you, Adnan and P.Kord will have a section all to yourself. And not just on my page either. Thanks M.Bell