Off topic post becomes on topic (was: A query for the classicists]]
Brian Dean bridean@worldnet.att.net
Fri, 09 Oct 1998 19:32:36 -0400 (00907993956, 361E9D13.C73D185A@worldnet.att.net)
> >> :[Michael]
> >> :"Heard a great lecture tonight from Dr. Scott Hahn, who pointed out
> >> :that there would be no concept of human rights at all without the
> >> :Church, because it all emanates from the concept of person, which
> >> :was developed in the Church's struggle to define who Christ was in
> >> :the face of heresies like the Arians, Docetists, Nestorians, etc.
> >> :The word person did not exist in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek. It was
> >> :part of the vocabulary the Church developed to fight heretics who
> >> :challenged the humanity or divinity of Christ.
> >>
> >> [Simon]
> >> Is Dr. Hahn suggesting that the use of the English word 'person' in
> the OT
> >> (including Genesis) is a mistranslation? If so, what is the real
> meaning of
> >> the word translated as 'person'?
> >>
> >> Genesis certainly precedes 'Christ' whether 'Christ' is used as
> Jesus'
> >> surname or as meaning 'messiah' or anointed since it is obviously
> used
> >> pre-Jesus and pre-Saul (the first to be anointed, I think).
> >
> >
> >
> >RON
> As you know Brian, I would suggest that there are many inaccurate
> "translations" and paraphrases in modern english versions, even the New
> American.
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com