(Ron) On the use of "begat"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 09:53:02AM -0700, bridean wrote:

> BRIDEAN

> What I would say is that even if "day" in Genesis can be interpreted as

> "millions of years" or whatever, the order in which things were created

> contradicts current scientific understanding.


JEFF
I have a french book that claims that the Genesis account is perfectly
in accordance with science, and that where it isn't, science is wrong.
(And goes from there to convince you, in the last dozen pages, that
fundamentalist christianity is correct!) 

So, umm, are you convinced then that the Genesis account is true and
accurate?  I sure hope so!


:),

Jeff
-- 
\/ jepler@inetnebr.com http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jepler/ (0|1(01*0)*1)+

• Previous message: (Ron) On the use of "begat"
• Next message: (Ron) On the use of "begat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]