A query for the classicists (Correction: silly list labeling rules followed)
Jeff Epler jepler@inetnebr.com
Fri, 2 Oct 1998 07:53:41 -0500 (00907350821, 19981002075341.A1612@craie.inetnebr.com)
JEFF
Apologies to everyone, I'm too well trained to follow the usenet quoting
style. Shoot me.
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998 at 07:13:32AM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 10:45:42PM -0700, Michael W. Fisher wrote:
> > A query for the classical scholars on the list.
> >
> > What is the truth value of the assertions of the good Dr. Hahn in regard
> > to "person" in the excerpt below, plucked from an apologetics list I
> > lurk on:
> >
> > "Heard a great lecture tonight from Dr. Scott Hahn, who pointed out that
> > there would be no concept of human rights at all without the Church,
> > because it all emanates from the concept of person, which was developed in
> > the Church's struggle to define who Christ was in the face of heresies
> [...]
>
JEFF
> So, if one of the ideas that X originated was good, then X is good? Does
> this sound like a credible argument to anyone? Even granting the claim
> that Christianity originated the idea of personhood, and that the idea of
> personhood is good, I can't see how it follows that Christianity is good.
>
> Will Dr. Hahn accept that if rejecting the concept of god when explaining
> physical phenomena has paved the way for most of the great discoveries in
> physics for the last 200 years, atheism must be a pretty good thing? I
> think not, and I don't know why his explanation of why not wouldn't apply
> with equal force to his argument. Unless, of course, he'd like to appeal
> that Christianity is true and atheism was false, but the goal seemed to
> make it credible that Christianity was true, and thus his argument would
> become circular.
>
> Jeff
> --
> \/ http://www.freshmeat.net/ Jeff Epler jepler@inetnebr.com
> A good supervisor can step on your toes without messing up your shine.
--
\/ http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jepler/ Jeff Epler jepler@inetnebr.com
Insomnia isn't anything to lose sleep over.