Was Jesus Human?

Bryce Anderson bryce_anderson@yahoo.com
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 07:02:29 -0800 (PST) (00911250149, 19981116150229.5732.rocketmail@send103.yahoomail.com)






---Farrell Till <jftill@midwest.net> wrote:

>
> At 05:43 PM 11/15/98 -0800, Dave Gaban wrote:
> >G. R. Gaudreau wrote:
> >>
> >> M.BELL
> >> See if you can peruse the NT sometime. You will find to your
surprise
> >> that the penal code of the OT has been abrogated under the New
> >> Covenant.
> >>
> >> [grgaud]
> >> Chapter and verse, please.
> >>
> >> G. R. Gaudreau
> >
> >Dave G.
> >
> >Galatians 3:10 All who rely on observing the law are under a curse,
for
> >it is written: " Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do
> >everything written in the book of the law."
> >
> >Ephesians 2:15 by abolishing in his flesh the LAW WITH ITS
COMMANDMENTS
> >AND THE REGULATIONS.
> >
> >Colossians 2:14 having CANCELLED THE WRITTEN CODE, WITH ITS
> >REGULATIONS,...
> >
> >Hebrews 7:18 The former REGULATION IS SET ASIDE BECAUSE IT IS WEAK
AND
> >USELESS 19 (FOR THE LAW MADE NOTHING PERFECT)...
> >
> >I'm sure there are more, but this will do for now.
> >
>
> TILL
> You're right. There's more, much more. The NT very clearly teaches
that
> the old covenant was abrogated and replaced with a new.
>
> Farrell Till
> Skepticism, Inc.
> jftill@midwest.net
BRYCE But weren't the ten commandments part of the "old covenant?" If so, why weren't they invalidated as well? There are three ways to decide whether or not one of the commandments in the OT is valid: 1) Assume all OT laws are valid unless specifically superseded by a written NT law. 2) Assume that no OT laws are valid, and only laws set forth in the NT have any bearing. 3) As you read through the OT, simply read each commandment, and if you burst out laughing, it must not be a valid law. Number 1 seems to be a problem, because I can only remember a few dietary customs specifically being revoked. Number 2 might exclude the ten commandments, and would probably be unacceptable to most Christians. Number 3 is a bit too subjective. Also, I'd like someone to explain to me exactly when the OT laws were invalidated. The law was supposed to be in effect until Christ made his sacrifice, but if this is the case, how could Christ have been considered perfect? If nothing else, he violated the law by healing on the Sabbath. Also, if the old law was in effect until Christ died, then his restatement of most of the ten commandments to the rich man doesn't make those commandments part of the new covenant. Would anyone care to correct me if I've misstated the christian position? == Bryce Anderson http://members.tripod.com/~Idafab/index.html Justify the existence of your local Highway Patrol. GUN IT! When you lose the Holy Spirit, you become stupid. -a friend of mine _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com