*Alward: All or Nothing (My thanks to Till)
Farrell Till jftill@midwest.net
Fri, 13 Nov 1998 01:25:55 -0800 (00910970755, 2.2.32.19981113092555.00894604@midwest.net)
At 12:33 AM 11/13/98 EST, JAlw@aol.com wrote:
>ALWARD
>Here are the current outstanding differences of opinions between Till and
>myself:
>
>
>TILL
>Did you mean to say "differences of opinions between Till and ME"?
>
>=====================
>Joe Alward:
>
>Yes, thanks; I certainly did. I caught that error when I was reading the post
>after I had sent it. I was certain you would call everyone's attention to it.
>
>The reason for this post, however, is not only to thank you but to say that
>I'm trying to digest your very lengthy post and probably won't respond fully
>until tomorrow. Perhaps I will give my response in two or more parts.
>
TILL
I'm really not interested in having you respond to this posting now. I
would rather see you first respond to my postings "Understanding Biblical
Inerrancy," refute the inerrantist arguments for verbal inspiration and
biblical inerrancy and then follow your rebuttal with a logical argument
that would give good reasons for thinking that an unverbally inspired Bible
could be inerrant and authoritative. That's the real issue between us.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net