*Alward: Consequences of Verbal Inspiration (Kluepfel)
JAlw@aol.com JAlw@aol.com
Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:29:18 EST (00910859358, 68ccd13a.364a47fe@aol.com)
In a message dated 98-11-11 19:38:12 EST, you write:
<< Subj: Re: The Consequences of Verbal Inspiration
Date: 98-11-11 19:38:12 EST
From: jftill@midwest.net (Farrell Till)
Sender: owner-errancy@infidels.org
To: errancy@infidels.org
At 03:28 PM 11/11/98 EST, ChasKlu@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 11/10/98 8:40:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>jftill@midwest.net writes:
>
><< None of this,
> however, negates the fact that the Bible teaches that when God inspired
> individuals, he put his words in their mouths, >>
>
>Charlie
>I had thought that the best that the inerrantists could come up with even in
>the bible to support inerrancy was
> 2 Tim 3:16 All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching,
> for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
>
>Where in the Bible does it teach "that when God inspired individuals, he put
>his words in their mouth?"
>
TILL
Didn't you read my four postings entitled "Understanding Biblical
Inerrancy"? Your question is answered in them.
===================
Joe Alward:
I read the first two postins, but I didn't see where the bible teaches that
the bible writers had no choice in the words they used, that God put the words
in the mouth of the writer of every verse. Charlie, if you find the reference
in Till's works, would you please let me know?