"No-choice", "pro-choice", etc.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

<snip<></snip>

>CLAIRE

>

>Dear Ian:

>

>I have never suggested that spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) or fetal

>deaths due to natural causes be prosecuted as if they were intentional

>(induced) abortions.

>

>As for the RCC posting a bond, I think it would be more cost-effective to

help

>with prenatal care and the adoption process, because there are so many

people

>out there waiting to adopt infants. If anyone wishes to dispute this, then

>please explain why so many people go abroad to adopt. They wouldn't do that

if

>it were easier to adopt infants in this country.

>

JOHN HAMILTON
The number of people waiting to adopt a child has no bearing on the abortion
argument.  It is not moral to force a woman to continue a pregnancy just
because some one else wants a baby.




CLAIRE

>Catholic organizations do sponsor crisis pregnancy centers, and I believe

that

>the pregnant women can receive prenatal care through these centers. So

there

>are programs in place to help women who are persuaded not to undergo

abortions.

>

>Regards,

>Claire

>

• Previous message: "No-choice", "pro-choice", etc.
• Next message: "No-choice", "pro-choice", etc.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]