"Hello, I must be going" - by Jesus and the LongGoodbyes

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

JASON FILLEY

>Again, if anyone cares to explain how Jesus' resurrection happened both on

>the day of the resurrection AND forty days later, I'll tell you how Jesus'

>ascension actually happened 540 days after the resurrection.  But you have

>to show me yours first.


RALPH
Gleason Archer has an absolutely hilarious "how it could have been"
explanation of this in his "Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties," p. 367-68.

JASON FILLEY
I'm hoping an inerrantist (are there any left on the list?) will provide an 
explanation.  When I get an explanation (hopeful word), I will use the same 
methods and reasoning to show that Jesus actually ascended 540 days, AND 18 
months, AND 18 aeons after the resurrection, thus 'proving' the divine 
inspiration of works most Xtians have never even heard of.

I was in a Southern Baptist church service one time where the preacher 
quoted Gamaliel saying something or other, from the Archko Volume.  Nobody 
in the church missed a nod.  Never phased them.

Once more, by using the same methods and reasoning used to harmonize the 
canonical accounts of the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, any 
apocryphal work can be harmonized as well.

Takers?

Jason

• Previous message: Incest in Genesis
• Next message: Leaving the List
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]