Fw: Roswell Crash vs. Gospels (anecdotes)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>>RON

>>For many years there were reported sightings of the coelocanth, which 

>>scientists doubted. Eventually the existence of this creature was proven 

>>by its capture. How does one story's improbability disprove another 

>>story you consider improbable? The real question is what is the Truth? 

>>There is a reality independent of what you or I suspect to be true or 

>>false. The truth/falsity of Christianity will not be determined by our 

>>arguments, whether well-founded or not.

>>

>

>TILL

>Ron can't seem to understand that this statement is something that a Muslim

>or a Mormon or a Hindu could say verbatim as "proof" of the truth of their

>religions.  I would ask him to read it again, imagining that it is something

>that a believer of another religion is saying to him.  Then I would like for

>him to tell us how he would "refute" this statement to show the Muslim or

>Mormon or Hindu that it is a fallacious argument.


RON
So now we are not discussing whether God exists, but which religion is 
the true religion? This is at least a step forward.

• Previous message: About html
• Next message: Fw: Roswell Crash vs. Gospels (anecdotes)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]