Noah and Evolution.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> > APRIL

> > First of all, the flood isn't evolution... 

> 

> M.BELL

> You and others state that Noah and the flood account is not evolution.

> Well, I won't argue the point and generate more off-topic nonsense, even

> though I believe it is inexorably linked to evolution. As the thread

> develops we will see who is correct. In fact the first part of your first

> question, 'how did Noah keep the polar bears cold enough' may take you on

> the subject of evolution immediately. Please demonstrate that the polar

> bear was present pre-flood and is not a product of adaption through

> environmental conditions  post-flood? At what point in the geological

> column are polar bears introduced? Early or late? Does evolution consider

> polar bears to be derived from an earlier bear? You see, before one can

> postulate questions about how Noah kept them cold one needs to

demonstrate

> that they were their to be on the Ark in the first place? Once we have

> dealt with polar bears we can proceed to other matters related in your

> post.  

> 


April

So you're going to claim that any animal which causes problems for the
Noah's ark story just wasn't around 6000 years ago?  How convenient.  So if
I dig up the evolutionary history of the polar bear, and show that it's
been around longer than 6000 years, will you then tell me how he kept them
cold enough?  Do I have to give you the lineage of snakes, as well?  I will
get the information, but only if you promise me you will then deal with the
cold/hot issue.  Deal?

• Previous message: Noah and Evolution.
• Next message: Noah and Evolution.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]