fossils in many different locations

April adorsey@netusa1.net
Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:43:37 -0600 (00901410217, 199807251710.NAA17214@gatem02.netusa1.net)



>
> DJC
> Who said there was fresh water fish at the time of the flood; couldn't
> they have evolved afterwards? And God had already worked "one" miracle
> by bringing the animals together to the ark couldn't he have worked
> another to keep the water conditions as they needed to be?
>
> TERRY
> I don't know about evolving I would prefer to use the word adapting, but
I
> will agree with your point about God bringing the animals together to the
> ark David.
April Adapting, eh? So are you suggesting that you could "adapt" to breathing underwater, for example? Terry If God is able to create the universe and all the astounding
> things in it, then it would be quite simple for him to keep the water
> conditions needed for fish to survive and also for the animals to be able
to
> return to their natural location and it is not a hocus pocus answer. It
> simply can't be proven one way or the other that the flood existed or did
> not exist.
April OK, but let me ask you this, then. If God has to do all this hocus-pocus to make the flood a reality, then why have the flood at all? Why not just "vaporize" all the evil humans, and leave the rest of life alone? It certainly would have been easier, and made a whole lot more sense (like God ever made any sense...!). After all, God didn't have anything against the plants and animals, did he? Wasn't it just the evil humans he wanted to get rid of? Terry Here is a question I would like for
> someone to answer. Why do you find fossils of animals in many different
> locations in the world that are naturally cold such as Siberia and
northern
> Canada, that under conditions today would be entirely too cold for those
> animals to live.
April You have to give me specifics here, before I can answer this. The fossils of what have been found where? Terry And here is another question if the flood did not exist,
> why are there legends and stories of it in almost every society and every
> corner of the earth today known to man, they may not be exactly the same
but
> they have enough similarities in these stories that they may have
originated
> from the same source. Ok now lets see some speculation from you April.
>
April Nobody is denying that floods have occurred around the world - we had a fairly major one here just a few days ago. (Fortunately I live on the top of a hill, so was unaffected. Many of my Christian neighbors, however, lost some or all of their houses, and belongings. Maybe God is an atheist?) No one is also denying that a lot of our myths and legends have a common source. So an early human tribe had a major local flood, which, as the tribe expanded, moved and dispersed, continued in their history. Stories grow with the retelling, so, what, in actuality was a real, but local flood, becomes, over time, a world (at least as far as the tribe understands it) wide flood. And, if I remember correctly, the flood story is not as universal as the inerrantists would like us to believe. Many tribal cultures have no flood story at all. But I don't have the reference - anybody?
>
>
>
>