observation

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> 

> TILL

> >> >Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and that is all

> >> that we are demanding.  It isn't our fault that you have accepted 

> claims for which you can give no reliable evidence.  That's your 

> problem, not  ours.

> >> 

> >> 

> >> TERRY

> >> Who is this according to.  It seems you want everybody to play by the 

> rules you make up for the game.  You are also again speaking in plural 

> terms, who is this us and our and we Till, you are the one making this 

> assertion so why don't you say I and my and mine.  Maybe I should 

> express myself in that  fashion more often, maybe it will give (us) the 

> feeling of invincibility.

> >>

> april 

> >Terry, Terry, Terry, do we need to prove this yet again?  Ok, so here 

> goes -  I have an invisible tiny spotted elephant on my shoulder.  This 

> is an extraordinary claim, but, according to you, I need not provide 

> proof that this is true.  You, in fact, must prove it false.  So go for 

> it, guy - prove it is NOT true.  

> 

> DJC

> We don't have to prove a claim to be false.  The onus of providing the 

> proof lies with the one making the claim.

> 

> >


This is my point, David!  Make an extrordinary claim and YOU must provide
the proof!

April

• Previous message: observation
• Next message: observation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]