observation

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> TILL

> >Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and that is all

> that we are demanding.  It isn't our fault that you have accepted claims

> for which you can give no reliable evidence.  That's your problem, not

> ours.

> 

> 

> TERRY

> Who is this according to.  It seems you want everybody to play by the

rules

> you make up for the game.  You are also again speaking in plural terms,

who

> is this us and our and we Till, you are the one making this assertion so

why

> don't you say I and my and mine.  Maybe I should express myself in that

> fashion more often, maybe it will give (us) the feeling of invincibility.

> 


Terry, Terry, Terry, do we need to prove this yet again?  Ok, so here goes
- I have an invisible tiny spotted elephant on my shoulder.  This is an
extraordinary claim, but, according to you, I need not provide proof that
this is true.  You, in fact, must prove it false.  So go for it, guy -
prove it is NOT true.  

Do you see the point yet?

April

• Previous message: observation
• Next message: observation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]