Fwd: Re: Terry, where's your "Bible etc.

Brian Dean bridean@worldnet.att.net
Sun, 26 Apr 1998 20:46:05 -0400 (00893655965, 19980427003519.AAA8416@briandea) 


>BRIDEAN

>If this is true, then what do you need with an electric fence, a 16 year

>old girl, a 2' pecker, and an armored car?


DICK
Can't you ever get any facts straight at all? I have no
16 year-old girlfriend who is now older and no longer my
girlfriend. Unlike you, I do need my pecker since I can
find uses for it other than just pissing stale beer like
you. I need a *partially-armored* car because fools like
you have taken real pot shots at me, my house, my car, my
garage, and my dogs, killing two of them. Unlike you, I'm
capable of arousing passions in people, both positive and
negative.

BRIDEAN
Of course you know that a *partially armored* car would not protect you
from a powerful explosive underneath the car.  The up and down force of 
such an explosion, if it does not hurt the car, would be enough to hurt
you since your body would not be able to take the stress.  Oh, I forgot,
you are just a bunch of data stored in a computer chip aren't you?  In
that case, since computer chips can not handle electrical voltages of
greater than 6 volts very well, a strong electrical shock should do the
trick.


>DICK

>Not necessarily. FALLACY OF NON SEQUITUR.



>BRIDEAN

>Well, so far I don't see any evidence that you are capable of avoiding the

>FALLACY OF HUMOR AND RIDICULE.


DICK
But then you have no idea of what the word 'evidence'
means, do you, since it NEVER has anything to do with
words. And you seem to fail to realize that when no one
ever presents any logic for me to answer, then I can only
content myself by responding in kind with the same sort
of fallacies being used by the fools. Only I do them better.

BRIDEAN
Well, since you spend all of your time doing this, I am sure
you do better than people who have other things to do.


>And since you defend both Arius and the Roman Catholic Church


DICK
LIES, BRIDEAN, about all you ever do when you attempt to
venture into the real world. I have NEVER defended Arius
but on the contrary said his ideas were false. Can't you
read? I have never defended ANYTHING, much less the Holy
Roman Catholic Church, saying all religions are manmade
foolishness created to have power over human beings. 

BRIDEAN
Gee, and I thought in a previous post you said that the only TRUE
Christianity is the Roman Catholic version of it.  Sounds like a 
defense of Catholicism to me.

DICK
You just aren't capable of logical and rational thinking, are you?

BRIDEAN
Well, considering that I have material like:


>DICK

>The Catholic WAS and IS the ONLY form

>of true Christianity, and the ONLY basic Christianity. 


And then:

>DICK

>I have never defended ANYTHING, much less the Holy

>Roman Catholic Church, saying all religions are manmade

>foolishness created to have power over human beings. 


Which view of yours should I logically and rationally think about?