2Tim 3:16
Greg, Nancy, and James Todd todds@pa.net
Mon, 12 Jan 1998 21:01:08 -0500 (00884678468, 199801130201.VAA21843@emh1.pa.net)
>FULLER
>The Hebrew scriptures, if Martin Luther was right. I
>think he was. There are some things in the
>Apochrypha that give me doubts, but I've got enough
>battles to fight without going into that. What would
>you guys do without me to pick on?
>
>Later, maybe much later.
>
>AF
NANCY
But the authors of the gospels relied very heavily on the LXX, much more so
than the Palestinian "canon." In fact, they copied from it wholesale. Martin
Luther rejected books in the RC canon based on the fact that they were
written in Greek and not in Hebrew and were not included in the Jewish canon
(which was not set at the time the gospels were written, by the way).
However, in the finds at Qumran, mss of some of the deuterocanonical books
we found, written in Hebrew. Why would you accept the "scriptures" of Luther
over the "scriptures" used by the authors of the gospels?
Nancy Todd
todds@pa.net
>
>
>
>
>---Scott <scott@www.ina.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Subject: Re: 2Tim 3:16
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I take this to mean the Old Testament scriptures.
>> >
>>
>> Which Old Testament scriptures would that be?
>Could you give a list?
>> Could you give "versions"? I'm curious.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---"Phipps, John" <Phipps@info.pmeh.uiowa.edu>
>wrote:
>> > >
>> > > FULLER
>> > > 2 Tim3:16 All scripture is given by
>inspiration of
>> > > God, and is profitable for doctrine, for
>reproof, for
>> > > correction, for instruction in righteousness:
>> > >
>> > > PHIPPS
>> > > What scriptures existed at the time this
>statement
>> > was made?
>> > >
>> > > peace,
>> > > jp
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>_________________________________________________________
>> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
>> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>