Gen.1

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> IAN

> Because I'm not interested in when Genesis was written. I am interested

> only in what transpired or is alleged to have transpired at that time. 

> 

>  When I proposed this post, I stated that we will go through these books

>  without jumping ahead to any FUTURE book, 

> 

> BRIDEAN

> So you wouldn't accept certain critics of the book of Mormon (for

example)

> who claim that Joseph Smith riped off storys that were current during his

time?

> You would only be interested in what the book of Mormon says happened

> some 2000 or more years ago in the Americas?  In that scenerio, would

> the criticism that the book of Mormon sounds a lot like a 19th century

> story written by (...) be jumping ahead to some FUTURE book?


IAN
I'm not interested in the BOM at all.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]